Who is Jesus Christ? Some people claim he was only a person, some people claim he was/is God, some state he is just a star developed out of historical Pagan urban myths, and the others very claim that Jesus never actually lived. Therefore who's right? Who was or who's Jesus Christ?

As a Religious, I think that Jesus could be the Christ, the Daughter of the Living God, and the Savior of Mankind. But, let's explore the number of choices by having an start mind.

Was Jesus Christ just a man, and nothing more? I think not. Someone who had been merely a man who went about stating things that he did will be considered insane! Let's face fact here. We secure people up in emotional institutions today when they make the sort of claims about themselves that Jesus did. However, Jesus is the most Balanced Person who actually lived! He gave number signals of emotional illness or instability at all! In fact, at age 12, he was therefore realized and therefore wise he pleased the Jews in the Forehead in Jerusalem! If Jesus was only a person, then by modern standards, we ought to decide him as ridiculous, and obviously take waste upon his followers as we would the supporters of anybody who is actually insane.

Is Jesus Christ only an amalgamation of ancient Pagan savior-gods? I think maybe not! The Bible clearly suggests that Jesus Christ was a old person who came the country working wonders and giving people expect eternal life. The "Pagan Christ" idea was common in 19th Century biblical scholarship, but everyone who understands such a thing knows that the theory is lifeless now. Just the most liberal of scholars offers the theory credence anymore, and that will inform us something. Those generous scholars loathe Lord, therefore of course they will understand at even the thinnest of straws if it indicates having a reason to carry on to decline Jesus Christ. The theory is lifeless, and let's keep it at that. Trivial similarities involving the Lord Jesus and ancient Pagan savior-gods doesn't suggest anything at all. It's just a theory, and a poor one at that!

Did Jesus never really stay in history? Some very trusting and uneducated people seriously buy into this principle, and they're distributing it via websites, publications, and DVD documentaries such as "The God Who Wasn't There" ;.What are we to think about this kind of theory and what're we to consider the folks who espouse that principle? What can we do? The only thing we could do would be to counter these "Jesus Myth" folks with details from the Bible and pray for them. God knows their hearts, and he knows why they hate Him, and just He can treat their wounds!

Therefore, who is Jesus? Clearly, the only rational and reasonable realization we could reach about Him, given the facts, is that He's just Who He said to be - GOD! Nothing otherwise is practical! As we have seen, the concepts of God-hating atheists and secularists only don't make sense and they don't fit the Biblical details!

In his guide, Who Is Jesus Christ For Us Nowadays, James Cone Ph.D., responses this issue taking into consideration the vibrant interplay between social situation, Scripture, and convention from a Black perspective.

By the "social context," Cone the christ  the encounter of Jesus Christ within our standard daily existence. It's the experience of Christ in the social world of injustice and oppression: an environment of top-dog and underdog. It is the knowledge of Jesus in the midst of life's absurdities that inspires one toward exploration of the Christological problem, "Who's Jesus Christ for us nowadays?

Cone warns against accepting nevertheless, that this is of Christ is derived from or based mostly on our cultural context. He demands that the Scriptures should also be incorporated in to our overall knowledge of the reality of Jesus Christ. He feels that this really is vital because it offers us with reliable information in regards to the Jesus Christ we encounter in our cultural existence.

Custom, Cone declares, is "the connection that joins Scripture with this contemporary situation." He sees the Dark religious convention as representative of the Dark Church's affirmation of the mankind along with affirmation of their trust at various junctions in history. That, he thinks, provides the Dark Church of today with a deeper comprehension of the facts of Jesus Christ.

In accordance with Cone then, cultural context, Scripture and convention sort the theological presuppositions upon which an analysis into the meaning of Christ should begin.

Who's Jesus Christ for all of us today? Cone poignantly highlights that "Jesus is who He was." The old Jesus was the truly human Jesus who had been also a Jew. His humanness and His identity as a Jew are both relevant and essential for the affirmation of faith. Cone stresses that Jesus was not really much a "universal" person, but He was a "particular" person; a certain Jew who stumbled on meet God's will to liberate the oppressed. Blacks could relate with the old individual Jesus since He stood as a symbol of human enduring and rejection. Jesus also, was unaccepted and rejected of men; Jesus also, was beaten and condemned, mistreated and misunderstood; Jesus too, suffered from an unjust cultural process where in fact the "small ones" were oppressed. Greens recognized with the famous Christ simply because they thought He shared in their misery and struggles. Minus the humanness of historic Jesus, Cone contends that "we have no basis to contend that His coming bestows upon people the courage and the wisdom to struggle against injustice and oppression."