Thanks for asking the questions that come to the mind, even though they seem "somewhat peculiar" to you. In Enlightenment all perceived pain has faded, for what but wrong-mindedness seemed to make the misperception named pain.

Pain was the dream that Christ could leave a Supportive Creator's Mind. "If suffering is true there's number God. If God is actual there's number pain."(W-190.3) The latter is true since God has no opposite. Enlightenment entails no pain or displeasure about ANYTHING, for Enlightenment is Pure, acim Constant Pleasure, Peace, Freedom, and Joy. Being Constant, Enlightenment understands perhaps not of change. The impression of susceptibility and changing emotions has gone as well. There is number ego to drop "straight back into." Nature Abides in light Love. All pain has ended Now and nothing remains but a benefit of Stillness.

The Sacred Heart could be the memory that Life is Eternal. The Present Time could be the gateway to Eternity. The entire world of photos was an environment of illusion. Photos are thus neutral to the Sacred Spirit. They certainly were "neutralized" the instant they appeared to arise.

What does this mean in relation to your next problem? You can't destroy what's never existed, and in the Sacred Spirit's Perspective of forgiveness damage is impossible. Figures were never created and never die because the planet of photos could be the past. It is impossible to find beginnings and endings in a program that is currently prepared and over extended ago. There is number life in images. Here is the indicating of "Hold no graven images ahead of the Lord Thy God." All photos were made to hidden the Reality from awareness, and they are able to only be forgiven as one illusion. If illusions might be divided up into residing and dead, natural and inorganic, animate and inanimate Enlightenment would be impossible. For what's Enlightenment but Real Oneness, far beyond the possibility of division of any sort? The separate mind was the illusion. Find not to challenge the split brain to types and call some forms living and some forms dead. God knows maybe not form. The separate brain was the "killer" illusion, the Sacred Spirit reminds the sleeping mind that what's whole and good can never BE split. In Heaven Brain is One Spirit, and even regarding that world forgiveness shows that Oneness. The understood earth understands the unity of the relieved brain and considers that there is nothing "outside" of the single mind which desires lightly a pleased, mild dream. The target of ACIM would be to desire softly of a sinless world. This goal is more than possible, it's certain!

As for my appearing diet, "eat what is served" is the Guidance I was presented with from the Sacred Nature a long time ago. Join with your brother and allow number principle come involving the Enjoy you share. This Advice has not changed. "Dinner" is definitely a background for sharing the Pleasure of the Residing Moment. What the world calls "breathing" and "eating" and "drinking" and "sleeping" are really yet in the Enlightened State. The Relieved Perspective considers the sameness of all things because each of them share the same Function: forgiveness. That Perception is not "particular," for in single notion nothing is personal. God isn't any respecter of persons. I virtually can not "take" an animal's "life" because Living is Heart and can just only be extended or Given as God Gives. "Take" has no indicating in my mind and since animals have not "lived" it is difficult that they may "die." The opinion indicated in thinking "privately get an animal's life" has many main assumptions that are false. In right-mindedness it's obvious that a few ideas are heightened since they are given away or shared, and "taking" a "life" or some thing doesn't have meaning. All that I give is given to mySelf, and in offering there is number loss, number sacrifice, and nothing is ever recinded from wholeness and unity. The teacher of God does not want anything that cannot be provided away. Such is the Pleasure of miracles! The thought vegetables be seemingly flung every-where, yet there's never a good view back to see where in actuality the vegetables land. The vegetables are never for an "other," and since offering and receiving are the exact same your head gets the gifts it gives. This really is really the party you find for beneath the ego's questions.

The only real issue that require be asked is really a problem that's not necessarily absurd at all: Am I prepared to understand that God's May and My Own would be the Same? God's Can for Me is for Ideal Happiness. And what but that Will could be the Can of Christ? Joyfully, nothing may change Eternal Love. Thank You God!